Megyn Kelly Says We Will Hear From Epstein “Directly”

Excuse me?

Commentator Megyn Kelly raised eyebrows when she said that we would be hearing from Jeffrey Epstein “directly,” if she is “allowed” to make it happen.

Wait, what?

“We’re not done with Jeffrey Epstein. I can tell you that for a fact. Can’t tell you how I know, but I can tell you for a fact,” said Kelly.

“We’re gonna hear a lot more about Jeffrey Epstein in the coming year… and you may be even hearing from him directly. More on that, as I’m allowed to tell it,” she added.

Jeffrey Epstein supposedly killed himself in a jail cell suicide in August 2019, and although many believe it wasn’t suicide, all but a small fringe do think he’s dead.

But the former Fox News host’s bizarre remarks have prompted a new wave of speculation.

In reality, what’s she’s likely referring to is some sort of tape or on the record statement that was made by Epstein before his death.

Whether that sees the light of day may well be down to whether Megyn Kelly is “allowed” to release it, apparently.

As we highlighted earlier, one of Epstein’s victims, a teenager, says she was used to extract “blackmail” information from prominent American politicians.

The names of those men, as well as other ‘Presidents and Prime Ministers’ embroiled in the scandal, are yet to be released as part of the latest Epstein document releases.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Epstein Victim Was Used to “Obtain Blackmail Information” on “Prominent American Politicians”

Next Post

Vanity Fair Published A Hit Piece On Epstein Files Just Hours Before Clinton ‘Threat’ Revelation

Comments 3
  1. Yup, chief justice John Roberts is one of the people on that list that continues to be suppressed. Hence fighting to save Obamacare, which was out of his lane, leaking the Roe decision, C’mon people isn’t it obvious, and then denying Texas the right to challenge Voter fraud in Georgia because they don’t have standing. Really? The last time I checked Texas was in the USA and election fraud at the Presidential level absolutely impacts them. You don’t even have to be a lawyer to see through that charade.

Leave a Reply.

Read next
1
Share

Discover more from modernity

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading