Court documents just unsealed in a Maryland federal case have laid bare the grubby mechanics of the COVID origins cover-up.
A senior adviser to Anthony Fauci has pleaded guilty to conspiring to hide government records, while British scientist Peter Daszak—long the public face of EcoHealth Alliance’s risky bat coronavirus work in Wuhan—showered him with gifts for his “behind the scenes shenanigans.”
David Morens, former senior adviser at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, admitted this week to using private Gmail accounts to shield communications from Freedom of Information Act requests.
Prosecutors say he and his co-conspirators worked to “counter the narrative that Covid-19 leaked from a lab” and to restore funding for EcoHealth’s suspended bat coronavirus experiments in China.
The details are damning. After the Trump administration suspended EcoHealth’s NIH grant in April 2020 amid growing fears the research may have sparked the pandemic, Morens moved conversations off official channels.
In one message he told Daszak and another associate: “This is sent from my gmail account. Please send all replies here To gmail […] There are things I cant say except [Senior NIAID Official 1] is aware and I have learned that there are ongoing efforts within NIH to steer through this with minimal damage to you.”
Morens promised to help get the funding restored. “My boxing gloves are on and laced up,” he wrote. Later: “Let’s win this anti-science battle, get you refunded… then settle the scores and kick some ass.”
He even agreed to write a “scientific commentary” promoting Daszak’s work while deliberately keeping the EcoHealth president’s name out of it, creating the appearance of independent scientific consensus. Prosecutors noted the pair “concealed their communications” precisely so papers and articles could be published without fingerprints.
Daszak’s response was liquid gratitude. He sent two bottles of The Prisoner Red Napa Valley wine to Morens’s Maryland home with a note: “This is the first of what I hope will be a continued series of expressions of gratitude for your advice, support and behind the scenes shenanigans in my battle against your bosses boss, his boss and the ultimate boss on the hill (referring to Donald Trump).”
He added that it took “courage and commitment” given the “vindictive nature of the Administration.”
Morens later published an article arguing COVID-19 was a “natural” spillover and that Daszak’s research was vital to preventing the next pandemic. All while fretting about FOIA. He called the requests “dreadful and paranoia inducing” and declared: “We are all smart enough to know to never have smoking guns, and if we did we wouldn’t put them in emails, and if we found them we’d delete them.” He boasted he could “make emails disappear after I am FOIA’d.”
Morens pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit offenses or to defraud the United States. He faces up to five years. Neither Daszak nor the second co-conspirator has been charged.
The revelations dovetail with years of evidence that powerful figures worked overtime to bury the lab-leak hypothesis while protecting the very research pipeline that made it possible.
In April 2020 emails, Daszak admitted to Morens that EcoHealth still had “15,000 coronavirus samples in freezers in Wuhan” and could sequence “700+ CoVs.” Fauci was described as “fully aware” and involved in “damage control.” Those samples—and the experiments they enabled—never received the scrutiny they demanded.
Daszak had already thanked Fauci personally in April 2020 for publicly dismissing the lab-leak theory. In a glowing email he wrote that Fauci’s comments were “brave” and would “help dispel the myths being spun around the virus’ origins.” He looked forward to thanking him in person. Fauci replied simply: “Peter: Many thanks for your kind note. Best Regards, Tony.”
That same year Daszak orchestrated the infamous Lancet letter branding lab-leak discussion a “conspiracy theory.” He failed to disclose his own conflicts. He was then put in charge of The Lancet’s task force to investigate the virus’s origin—an appointment so conflicted it eventually collapsed under pressure. He was finally fired from the commission after the conflicts became impossible to ignore.
The protection went further. When Daszak returned from the WHO’s origins mission in China in February 2021, U.S. Customs and Border Protection flagged him as “an extremely high person of interest.” Officers prepared a full Tactical Terrorism Response Team exam. They noted his long collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, his role as principal investigator on NIH grants funding bat coronavirus work, and that “much of the funding DASZAK receives is put towards gain of function research.” They planned to question him about samples, contacts, and why he was chosen for the WHO team.
Three days before he landed, the FBI’s New York field office intervened: “Please be advised FBI New York requested we do not stop the subject.” The inspection was cancelled. Daszak walked through JFK untouched.
Intelligence assessments that pointed toward a lab origin were also sidelined. Defense Intelligence Agency analysis as early as 2020 found the molecular biology and genome of SARS-CoV-2 “consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus.”
A later DoD report showed the Pentagon under Biden suppressed dissemination of such findings. One National Center for Medical Intelligence working paper noted that the influential “Proximal Origin” paper—itself coordinated behind the scenes—did not lessen the plausibility of laboratory origin. Yet the public messaging remained locked on natural spillover.
U.S. investigators have gone further still, concluding the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in collaboration with the Chinese military, ran a classified program genetically manipulating coronaviruses—including strains from the Mojiang mineshaft—to enhance human transmissibility. Researchers at the lab fell ill with COVID-like symptoms in November 2019. The trail of open scientific papers went dark precisely when the classified work intensified.
EcoHealth and Daszak were finally debarred from federal funding for five years after investigations found taxpayer money had funded the risky research and that reporting requirements were violated. The organization is now defunct. Daszak has moved on to a new nonprofit. Morens has taken a plea. The emails, the wine, the private channels, the stand-downs, and the suppressed assessments remain.
When the Trump administration tried to cut the funding and demand answers, the bureaucracy circled the wagons. Private emails replaced official records. “Independent” scientific statements were coordinated. Border inspections were cancelled.
Intelligence assessments that challenged the preferred narrative were bottled up. And the man whose organization funneled American money into the Wuhan lab was treated as a protected asset rather than a central figure requiring hard questions.
The guilty plea and the newly detailed court documents do not invent this history. They simply confirm what the documents, the emails, and the timeline have shown for years. The “behind the scenes shenanigans” were real. The effort to counter the lab-leak narrative was deliberate. And the cost—in lives, in liberty, and in public trust—was enormous.
Accountability is arriving late. Nevertheless, it is still arriving.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
More news on our radar