Trees Get Bigger Around the World Thanks to Higher CO2 Levels

Trees are getting larger around the world due to higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide fertilisation.

This post, authored by Chris Morrison,was republished with permission from The Daily Sceptic.

Recent scientific investigation, curiously missing from constant mainstream media reports of ecological Armageddon, confirms that trees are getting larger around the world due to higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide fertilisation.

A little extra of the gas of life, nature’s bountiful plant food, has led to bigger trees and more leaf growth over the last few decades. The recent small recovery in the near-denuded level of CO2 that was a threat to plant and human life on Earth has led to an astonishing 15%-plus increase in overall global vegetation growth in the last 40 years. Plants including trees have evolved to thrive in levels of atmospheric CO2 about three times higher than the current 420 parts per million (ppm) and scientific evidence is clearly showing rising levels are leading to faster growth in flora that is both healthier and more resistant to nature’s hazards such as drought.

Fascinating results are starting to emerge from a controlled Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) experiment conducted since 2017 by the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research. This involved increasing CO2 levels to 550 ppm across patches of a 180-year old Oak forest in Staffordshire, England. When compared to controlled plots without the COboost, it was found that oaks fed with the extra plant food showed growth rates that were an astonishing 10% higher in the period 2017-2023. Most of the growth is attributed to wood production. Compared to trees making do with the current 420 ppm, the boosted oaks are estimated to have produced an additional 1.7 tonnes of dry matter per hectare per year.



Early results also show that mature oak trees increased their photosynthesis rate by up to 33% due to the elevated CO2 levels, particularly in strong sunlight. Capture of CO2 by wood rather than leaves means the sequestration will be longer lasting. The carbon-nitrogen ratio in leaves remained stable and this suggests the trees adapt easily by redirecting nutrients or absorbing more nitrogen from the soil. Of course these results illustrate that sequestration of CO2 is a natural process and it has been ongoing for at least 600 million years. Much higher levels of CO2, for which there is no evidence of a causal link with runaway temperatures, have been gradually reduced with a recent low point of 280 ppm in the pre-industrial age, skirting with ecological disaster at the dead-planet level of around 150 ppm.

FACE experiments are not new and have been used to assess CO2 growth rates in trees in a number of locations. A long-term project in the Duke pine forest in Orange County, North Carolina found higher annual growth of 27% when trees were fumigated with another 200 ppm dose of CO2. In this case, photosynthetic rates by canopy foliage increased by up to 50% while the actual size of the trees, or the basal area increment, was stimulated by between 13-27%.

It seems that wherever you look, gluttonous trees around the world have been bulking up on CO2 at both existing levels and those set in experiments. A recent article published by a group of researchers working out of Ohio State University found that over the last 50 years in 10 forest groups, all types except Aspen Birch increased their per-hectare volume. Between 1970 and 2015, trees produced a 20-30% increase in biomass compared to trees from 30 years prior. The study suggested that all those porky pines and poplars were sequestering about 700-800 million tons of CO2  a year in the US, equivalent to roughly 10-13%  of the country’s total CO2 emissions.

If running scared of CO2 is your political thing, this news should be most welcome. Tree planting is all the virtuous rage to justify elite ‘business-as-usual’ lifestyles, but the heavy and natural greening of the planet is not generally mentioned in polite mainstream society. Carbon dioxide is seen as a ‘devil gas’ and the need to promote the Net Zero fantasy leads to an odd and skewed understanding of its benefits. In the UK, this has led to the Mad Miliband setting up a ridiculous scheme to ‘capture’ pitiful amounts of CO2 and lock it up for ever more at a cost of £22 billion.

At least regular readers of the Daily Sceptic are not remaining uninformed about the staggering amounts of vegetation growth and de-desertification that is occurring as COlevels show a small recovery from the near-death experience in recent historical times. Recently, two scientists in Spain found a “striking” growth in global greening. A significant portion of Earth’s terrestrial land surface was said to show a measurable increase in vegetation cover over the last four decades. Meanwhile, crop yields have soared in the last 60 years helped by hydrocarbon-produced fertiliser and increased CO2, while deserts are reducing in places such as the southern Sahara. While kids in the Western world are sent to bed crying with their brainwashed heads full of Attenborough-style agitprop, at least many children in less developed parts of the world have slightly fuller bellies.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Berlin to Build New Asylum Complex For Over 1,000 Migrants While Locals Face Housing Crisis

Next Post

They Got Absolutely Thrashed

Comments 5
  1. Demonising CO2 is just UN scam to get control of the world population. They are fleecing everyone on Carbon Tax and using the money for humanities demise. The young are being brainwashed at school. There is so much up to date research to prove its all a scam. The Climate would be doing fine if it wasnt for the demons attacking the gas of life. Trump has been handed research out of Princeton Uni. Prof Napper. (on internet)Trump has been informed ” Nett Zero will bring any economy to its knees.”. Well done Milliband you will destroy UK. The research is there but you dont want to read it. Why? because you know the truth and for some reason you want to destroy this economy and our green & pleasant land.

  2. I have known that ‘climate change’ is a scam ever since it became a ‘thing’. Miliband should be locked up in an institution. Our government is planning on cutting disability benefits in order to ‘save’ £5billion and get those pesky disabled people back to non-existent work (Rachel Reeves screwed that one up). In the meantime, £22billion is to be spent on ‘carbon’ capture. Cancel this madness and there would be a ‘spare’ £17billion for other things – though there is no such thing as ‘spare’ money when it is all stolen from the taxpayer.

    In context, even if this hideously expensive (and remember, infrastructure projects tend to double in cost or more in the UK) were to succeed by 2050, we could capture – wait for it – 0.047% of man made global CO2. It annoys me that figures are quoted that since the industrial revolution, the UK is said to have made 3% accumulated CO2. While forgetting their lives would be VERY different without British innovations. Sounds very much like the lunatics who try to get slavery ‘reparations’, even though the UK was the first country to end slavery and encourage others to do so at massive cost.

Leave a Reply.

Read next
0
Share
0 items

modernity cart

You have 0 items in your cart