UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers

But excludes French philosopher concerned about demographic change

This post, authored by C.J. Strachan, was republished with permission from The Daily Sceptic

The British Government recently barred French writer Renaud Camus from entering the UK. His crime? Not actual incitement, not violence, not lawbreaking, but a controversial idea.

Camus, originator of the ‘Great Replacement’ theory, was scheduled to speak at a Big Remigration Conference organised by the Homeland Party, as well as at the Oxford Union. His Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) had been approved. Then, abruptly, it was revoked. The Home Office declared that his visit was “not conducive to the public good”.

Meanwhile, Julius Malema, a South African political figure who openly sings “Kill the Boer” at rallies, glorifies racial violence and promotes land expropriation without compensation, was welcomed.



This is not a metaphor. Malema was allowed into the UK in May 2025 to address his supporters in London. The only reason for his delayed arrival was the May Day bank holiday. When he protested, the British High Commission issued a grovelling apology, assuring him the visa holdup was merely bureaucratic, not moral.

The message could not be clearer: ideas from the Right are criminalised, but hate from the Left is indulged.

Toby Young has recently laid this out in detail in his excellent interview on GB News in the wake of the Lucy Connolly appeal decision. His conclusion: the UK no longer defends free speech as a principle, it defends only approved speech. You can chant about killing white farmers, provided your politics check the right boxes. But offer a sociological theory about demographic change? You’re banned.

Let’s be clear: Renaud Camus’s theory is provocative. It raises uncomfortable questions about identity, culture and immigration. One can challenge or reject it. But to silence it entirely, while welcoming actual political violence wrapped in revolutionary chic, is not only hypocritical. It’s dangerous.

A society that punishes ideas but excuses incitement is not protecting its values. It is broadcasting its fear.

Camus, an elderly intellectual with no history of violence, was treated like a threat to national security. Malema, who has stood before crowds chanting genocidal slogans, was treated like a minor celebrity inconvenienced by airport queues. This isn’t policy. It’s ideology masquerading as law.

Once again, the UK has exposed the workings of its two-tier system. British citizens have been arrested for quoting Churchill, misgendering someone online or holding placards in silence. But a foreign politician calling for racial uprising is welcomed, because his fury flows in the approved direction.

Britain used to be a place where you could say what you thought, provided you didn’t call for violence. Now it’s a place where you can call for violence, provided you think what you’re told.

Renaud Camus was banned not because he posed a risk, but because he posed a challenge, a challenge to the dominant narrative. That makes him, in today’s Britain, more dangerous than a man who sings about killing his countrymen.

Malema is in. Camus is out. And that, sadly, tells you everything about who we are now.

C.J. Strachan is the pseudonym of a concerned Scot who worked for 30 years as a Human Resources executive in some of the UK’s leading organisations. Subscribe to his Substack page.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.


More news on our radar


Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Top DOGE Official Details Discovery Of Shocking Voter Fraud: “Tip Of The Iceberg”

Next Post

Epstein’s Lawyer Brokered Plea Deal Based On Intelligence Ties While Not Knowing About Them

Comments 6
  1. Eventually all liberalism, whether Marxist or non secular, when tasked with leadership roles cannibalize their own minds, or in 1960’s parlance “blow’s their own mind”, if you will, with their vacancy of heart that forces them into nihilism. The ideological mindset that there must be omnipresent oppressed and oppressor creates the perpetual petulance of irresponsibility to much for liberal leaders to bare.
    The 1960’s American “revolutionary” movements were instigated by Eurasians professors that followed “Johnny” when he came marching home again from WWII. They immediately went into American academia, gaining tenure just in time for the young fertile minds of the Boomers in elite universities where they became popular on strategically political elite university campuses rioting and railing about social and political justice. These indoctrinated bipolar, home grown free liberal social Justice warriors hated on America and slandered anyone in uniform service to her, cops, mailman and especially their own generational weary Nam combat veterans into oblivion. They vowed to march through the institutions (Gramsci), and indeed they did, capturing them by the 1990’s, including government.
    It has now been eights decades since WWII, as European Boomer youth began following American trends. Since the American liberals had captured the institutions by the 1990’s, it has been three decades now as they march toward male emasculation and female fragility to set the stage for the influx of illegals that Hillary was to begin in 2016, oop’s came the Trump train and MAGA.
    The American bipolar/liberal Marxist social justice engineering had hoped the guilt laden fragility of American women would seek out the masculine strength of migrants for natural protection as emasculated American men stood by and watched. Not gonna happen.
    As trends go, European Boomers, now their senior leaders with sixty-ism offspring still rush to be like their American Boomer counterparts, destroying their own countries on the razor thin ideology of trans, race, DEI Marxisms that are already being dismantled by America’s patriot MAGA movement and President Trump that the Leftists hate more than the Constitutional Republic’s laws that tether their liberal right’s and freedom from doing as they please without any responsible moral regard for another in a true democracy that is subordinate to Constitutional law.

  2. Judging by the condition of UK cities, government support of non-White immigrants over White, English natives, and the degredation of British culture to appease the massive anti-White movement in the UK, it would be safe to conclude that Camus’ theory is sunstantially proven at this point.

  3. No. Our treasonous “government” welcomes this creature. When their numbers are high enough, they’ll do the same to us. The chimps will run wild even more than they’re already doing.

  4. I’m NOT so sure that the majority of the UK population do not welcome Malema considering the size of the non-White immigrant population already here combined with indigenous woke anarchists.

    The indigenous White population of the UK is fast declining to begin with and a sizeable percentage of them don’t bother to vote anyway.

  5. Careful with that headline. The ‘UK’ most certainly does not welcome this guy, only our corrupt government does. They DO NOT speak for me or the majority of the population.

Leave a Reply.

Read next
1
Share
0 items

modernity cart

You have 0 items in your cart