Far Left UK Government Proposes BANNING “Controversial” Conversations

Critics warn of “Big Brother thought control”

The leftist Labour government in Britain has proposed radical reforms to the rights of workers that could include classing ‘sensitive’ topics of conversation in the workplace such as religion, women’s rights, or transgenderism as ‘harassment’.

The proposed legislation would force employers to prevent workers from being subjected to such subjects by third parties, such as customers. 

If they are found to have failed to do so, they could face lawsuits under the legislation.

Watchdog The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has warned that if it comes into the force next year, the proposed law could significantly impact freedom of expression and even be applied to “overheard conversations” such as those between two or more people in a pub.



The EHRC has noted that applying the harassment law in cases involving a “philosophical belief” could lead to problems owing to the fact that many employers do not understand such topics are protected by equality law.

“The legal definition of what amounts to philosophical belief is complex and not well understood by employers. It is arguable that these difficulties may lead to disproportionate restriction of the right to freedom of expression,” the watchdog warned.

A spokesman for the British Beer and Pub Association said in comments to The Times “Any legalisation must be carefully drafted to make sure it does not have unintended consequences, such as pub workers expected to decide whether private conversations between customers constitute a violation of law.”

Sir Tim Martin, founder and chairman of the pub chain Wetherspoons urged that the proposal “sounds like Big Brother thought control which would be a bureaucratic nightmare to enforce.”

Martin added, “All beliefs which challenge the status quo are contentious. Newton’s law of gravity and Einstein’s theory of relativity were contentious at one point. Or Alexander Fleming creating the biggest-ever advance in medicine from mould.”

“Humanity has progressed through these challenges and their subsequent debate,” he further emphasised, adding that “The cancellation of ideas is, in effect, a new religious commandment by those who think they’re not religious.”

Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK remarked “Every pub is a parliament. It is where we discuss the world. If that is restricted they might as well all close.”

More from GB News below:

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

London Council Admits It Will Discriminate Against White People In Job Advert

Next Post

Jennings: Biden Will Be Remembered For Making Trump More Popular Than Ever

Comments 7
  1. Your ignorance of the law is as breath-taking as usual. The truth is, pubs are private spaces, and like any private space, you may be there only as long as the owner (or the people employed by the owner) is OK with you being there. You may be told to leave the pub because the staff don’t like what you are saying, don’t like your clothes, don’t like you, they are having a bad hair day, you got drunk on the drinks they sold you, or no reason whatsoever. They are in their right to ask you to leave whenever they want to ask you to leave, full stop.

    So don’t bitch because you think you are losing a right that you never had. Insisting to stay in a place where you are not welcome already constitutes harassment. If the Labour government choose to waste their time over-regulating something that is already covered by existing law, that’s their prerogative, but it doesn’t change a thing about the actual state of things.

    1. You’re the one who is wrong. Currently, there is nothing stopping the owner instructing the staff to ignore any topics of conversation they may hear – leave the customers alone. However, when this new legislation comes in, owners will have a duty to ensure their staff are not offended by the customers’ choice of topic. Meaning that government is overriding the owners’ wishes in a horrendous example of totalitarianism.

  2. We should’ve left the UK to the nazis. They’d be living under less tyranny today, unlike the woke dictatorship they have now.

  3. UK is now transformed into a true Community State. Way to go boys. Glad we kept you from being overrun by Adolph when you had Stalin in mind the whole time.

Leave a Reply.

Read next
1
Share
0 items

modernity cart

You have 0 items in your cart