Russia’s ban on propaganda promoting a ‘childless lifestyle’ across all forms of media has passed the State Duma in a bid to address the country’s “catastrophic” demographic decline.
The ban covers anti-natalist messaging in movies, television, advertising and social media, and will hand out fines up to €4,000 euros, with civil servants facing double the punishment if they violate the new law.
“Everything needs to be done to make sure that new generations of Russians grow up with a focus on traditional family values,” said Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin after the law was rubber stamped in the lower house of the Russian parliament.
The legislation also restricts the international adoption of Russian children in countries where transgender ideology is dominant, prohibiting them from being adopted by parents who live in places where gender reassignment via medical surgery or changing official documents is legal.
???RUSSIA BANS ‘PROPAGANDA’ OF CHILDLESS LIFESTYLES
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) November 12, 2024
Russian MPs have unanimously approved a law banning the promotion of childless lifestyles, framing it as a rejection of Western liberal values.
The legislation prohibits public content, including films and media, that… pic.twitter.com/5pXTjcRHFy
“It is extremely important to prevent any encroachment on the possible change of gender by any means in case of adoptions to other countries,” said Volodin.
President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov previously described Russia’s demographic peril as a “catastrophic” situation that must be tackled at the highest level of government.
Russia’s birth rate currently stands at just 1.49, well below the 2.1 per woman replacement rate.
Analysis by the Atlantic Council predicted Russia’s population could halve by 2100, with the UN forecasting a 17 per cent drop over the next 50 years.
Russia’s birth rate is currently at its lowest in a quarter of a century, a situation that has been exacerbated by mounting fatalities as a result of the war with Ukraine.
Unlike Russia, western European countries have chosen to embrace mass migration to address their demographic decline, while openly encouraging the native population to have fewer children in the name of solving ‘climate change’.
Legacy media outlets continually promote the benefits of avoiding children, scaring women that they’ll lose their ‘freedom’ and encouraging males to live as man-babies in a state of permanent adolescence.
This culminated earlier this year when Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker faced a sustained backlash for daring to suggest that women should aspire to be mothers and homemakers.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Yes, when humans are allowed to do what they naturally do, population shortages don’t happen. See how much smarter the Russians are than we are? Being queer is not against the law in Russia, trying to make others queer is.
>Unlike Russia, western European countries have chosen to embrace mass migration to address their demographic decline, while openly encouraging the native population to have fewer children in the name of solving ‘climate change’.
Nope. The main reason to go for mass migration is because companies prefer workers with as little understanding as possible of local laws, which makes it a lot easier to give them less than what they are legally entitled to. Plus, local laws often favour natives, anyway, so migrants often are more convenient for companies.
And fewer children don’t solve climate change too well, because climate change has arrived already. New babies make little difference. Besides, the issue isn’t so much children but the size of the house. The same number of kids in a smaller house helps solve climate change. Obviously, if the average number of children per woman went a lot above 2, there would be a problem with the situation being sustainable long-term, but that isn’t happening.
What a load of twaddle you talk.
International companies are all about cheap labour and don’t give a fig whether invaders have any understanding of local laws/customs or not. Conglomerates also want control of the planet and humans, and they know that non-Whites are easiest of all to conquer. Whites are naturally questioning and rebellious which the globalists fear hence their agenda to eliminate White people with population replacement policies. They know only White people are capable of toppling them and their evil agenda(s).
Naturally-occurring Climate Change is normal. What is NOT normal is the contemporary speed of change and that’s because it is NOT natural. What we’re seeing is artificially induced Climate Change perpetrated by Big Tech companies across the planet. Man’s chemical manipulation of the earth’s climate is what is causing Climate Change, not the general population.
Quote: “What are the negatives of geoengineering?”
“Risks associated with geoengineering include environmental disruptions such as droughts; permanent damage to the ozone layer; an increase in acid rain; negative effects on ocean ecosystems; as well as political and social risks associated with human security.15 Nov 2022.
“Is stratospheric aerosol injection a good idea?”
“In the mid 1900s, humans were attempting to affect a specific weather event—cyclones. With stratospheric aerosol injection, they’d be affecting the entire world’s climate. The risks are high, and that makes the required bar for effective governance even higher.15 Mar 2023”
“Is stratospheric aerosol injection harmful to humans?”
“Unfortunately, there are dangers associated with stratospheric aerosol injection. This approach may reduce rainfall in some areas of the world. Loss of crops and access to fresh water due to reduced rainfall could lead to starvation and suffering”.
PS These chemicals filter back down to the ground and poison the soil which contaminates crops.
There are, of course, other examples of such techniques being used by Big Tech so it’s up to the public to educate THEMSELVES.
Their worst enemies are not white people per se. Their worst enemies are an educated populace.
We could start a programme directed at non-Whites about their breeding habits and start forcing them to cut down to two offspring only whilst resident in White homelands, a restriction that would not apply to White natives for obvious reasons. Any non-Whites who exceed the requisite number would lose citizenship and be deported back to their lands of racial origin.
So, russian government wants a country with russians? how non progressive! should follow europeans and white americans who commint suicide and bring africans and arabs to fck their women.
Hasn’t Russia tired of making war? Who would want to raise a child to have them see the garbage a dictator can manufacture?
“Everything needs to be done to make sure that new generations of Russians grow up with a focus on traditional family values,”……can you imagine how the press, education, feminists, politicians, here in the west would lose their s’t if you substituted Canadians, Americans, Britons in place of Russians!? That’s how screwed up western society has become. It’s also an indication of how Russia is doing it right.
They insist that (white) westerners shouldn’t have children, then use population decline as an excuse to import millions of illegal fiends.
You end up paying to educate foreigners who hate your culture then have to compete directly with the ones you educated. Lose, lose…..
We could learn much from Russia. They’re spot on with this one.
The only REAL White Christians on Earth and the only White people with BALLS!
GOD BLESS FREE, WHITE, CHRISTIAN RUSSIA!
DEATH TO GLOBAL JUDAIC NAZISM!
I truly can’t blame Russia on this, it’s all part of the Globalist plan to replace populations.
Yup!
White Humans must go!
Chocolate baboons must stay!