Trump Touts “Backup Plan” As SCOTUS CRUSHES Tariffs

The Supreme Court just handed a massive victory to globalist interests, striking down President Trump’s tariffs in a 6-3 ruling that undermines efforts to protect American industry and workers from unfair trade practices.

This decision, rooted in a narrow interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), exposes the deep state’s lingering grip on institutions meant to serve the people, not multinational corporations.

While the ruling sends shockwaves through the economy—boosting stock prices at the expense of long-term American sovereignty—dissenting voices including Justice Clarence Thomas expose the flawed logic, reminding us that Congress has historically empowered presidents to defend U.S. interests against predatory imports.

BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court just STRUCK DOWN President Trump’s tariffs.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court invalidated the tariffs.

NEWSNATION: “This is the exact wording from the ruling as we have it now, IEEPA, that International Economic Emergency Powers Act does not authorize… https://t.co/qYcFhUOkbe pic.twitter.com/AmUgZ2owIc

— Overton (@overton_news) February 20, 2026

The bombshell dropped when the Court invalidated tariffs imposed on goods from 80 countries, citing limits on presidential authority under IEEPA.

The decision slashes the effective statutory tariff rate from 16% back to 10%, easing pressures on corporate margins in the short term, but at what cost to American jobs?

The Trump administration has warned that $1T in tariff revenue is at risk.

JUST IN – U.S. Supreme Court has stated that refunding billions from Trump's illegal tariff collections "is likely to be a 'mess,'" but "may be required." pic.twitter.com/SpvqOSh5Yg

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) February 20, 2026

?JUST IN: SCOTUS Justice Brett Kavanaugh warns that CHAOS is about to ensue because President Trump would have to give REFUNDS for the tariffs — yet the court did not rule how that would play out

"That process is likely to be a MESS!" Kavanagh said

Ridiculous. pic.twitter.com/1u8kMl0syv

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 20, 2026

the US is about to get utterly obliterated on trade negotiations

SCOTUS has stripped all leverage from the Trump admin

— Tim Pool (@Timcast) February 20, 2026

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh stood firm in dissent. Thomas wrote that “neither statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the President.”

He added, “The Court has long conveyed to Congress that it may vest the president with large discretion in matters arising out of the execution of statutes relating to trade and commerce with other nations.”

“Congress authorized the President to “regulate . . . importation.” Throughout American history, the authority to “regulate importation” has been understood to include the authority to impose duties on imports,” Thomas continued.

He added, “The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt by the time that Congress enacted this statute, shortly after President Nixon’s highly publicized duties on imports were UPHELD based on identical language.”

“The statute that the President relied on therefore authorized him to impose the duties on imports at issue in these cases,” Thomas stressed, further urging that “Because the Constitution assigns Congress many powers that do not implicate the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may delegate the exercise of many powers to the President.”

“Congress has done so repeatedly since the founding, WITH THIS COURT’S BLESSING,” Thomas concluded.

Legal expert Jonathan Turley was quick to point out viable alternatives, confirming the administration’s resilience against globalist roadblocks.

“The admin has other tools…it can impose tariffs under other statutes,” Turley stated.

? JUST IN: Legal expert Jonathan Turley confirms Trump has a MASSIVE TOOLBOX of additional tariff options, the 6-3 SCOTUS ruling is NOT the end of the road

"The admin has other tools…it can impose tariffs under other statutes."

MAKE IT HAPPEN!pic.twitter.com/WwjQD62kO3

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 20, 2026

This toolbox includes statutes like Section 301 and 232, which bypass IEEPA’s constraints and allow targeted protections against dumping and unfair subsidies from adversaries like China.

Trump responded, noting that he has a “backup plan.”

Ok… so I did some digging, and yes, it appears President Trump did have a PLAN B if SCOTUS ruled against him.

The contingency plans include EXPANDED use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which allows tariffs on national security grounds and has already been used to… https://t.co/swgz2AGc1R pic.twitter.com/YX2VFtuzR0

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) February 20, 2026

Goldman: "Using Sec. 122 to quickly replace the 10-15% tariff most countries face while Sec. 301 investigations are under way would allow the administration to replicate most of the IEEPA tariffs using more legally solid authority. However, Sec. 301 investigations are… https://t.co/kYxXRsgLMX

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) February 20, 2026

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are already signaling swift action to reroute these measures, ensuring Trump’s trade agenda endures despite the Court’s meddling.

Critics of the ruling see it as another example of judicial activism thwarting populist reforms. While markets cheer short-term gains, the real losers are American manufacturers and workers who’ve suffered under decades of lopsided deals favored by elites in Washington and Beijing.

This decision echoes the establishment’s disdain for policies that put American interests ahead of cheap foreign labor and corporate profits. Trump’s tariffs had forced concessions from trading partners, including China’s tariff reductions and Malaysia’s massive semiconductor investments—proof that strength works.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.