Brussels bureaucrats have hit Elon Musk’s X with a massive penalty for refusing to play by their dystopian rules.
The European Union has fined the platform a whopping €120 million—around $140 million—for allegedly breaching its Digital Services Act (DSA). This marks the first major penalty under the controversial law, targeting what regulators call “deceptive” blue checkmarks, inadequate ad transparency, and failures in providing data to researchers.
In essence, it’s punishment for not bending the knee to the EU’s iron-fisted control over online content.
EU fines Elon Musk’s X €120mn for transparency violations https://t.co/AYeYSQjjzl
— Financial Times (@FT) December 5, 2025
The fine reeks of the same vindictive playbook the EU has used since Musk took over Twitter in 2022. It’s no coincidence; Brussels has been gunning for him precisely because he’s turned the platform into a haven for unfiltered discourse, refusing to censor at the whim of unelected technocrats.
This isn’t a one-off slap; it’s the culmination of years of threats and harassment. Back in January 2023, EU Commission Vice-President Vera Jourová openly warned Musk that his “freedom of speech absolutism” wouldn’t fly, declaring the “time of the Wild West is over” and threatening sanctions if Twitter didn’t comply with DSA rules. She conflated illegal content with anything the elites deem offensive, setting the stage for today’s fine.
At the WEF annual meeting, the EU regulator threatens Twitter and Elon Musk with sanctions.
— Igor Chudov (@ichudov) January 23, 2023
She is very unhappy about unapproved thoughts being expressed freely on Twitter.
Your thoughts are too dangerous for the EU bureaucrats to handle! pic.twitter.com/M27cykXqtF
In October 2023, EU Commissioner Thierry Breton fired off a letter demanding X address “illegal content and disinformation” related to the Gaza conflict. Musk fired back, demanding a specific list of violations so the public could judge for themselves.
Breton’s vague accusations—citing repurposed images and unverified claims—highlighted the EU’s preference for opacity over accountability. Musk called it out: “List the violations you allude to on X, so that the public can see them.” The EU’s response was not forthcoming, but the threats continued.
Our policy is that everything is open source and transparent, an approach that I know the EU supports.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 10, 2023
Please list the violations you allude to on ?, so that that the public can see them.
Merci beaucoup.
We take our actions in the open.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 11, 2023
No back room deals.
Please post your concerns explicitly on this platform.
Since Musk’s acquisition, X has become a battleground for free expression, reinstating accounts banned under the old regime and prioritizing user-driven content over algorithmic suppression. But for the EU, that’s the problem.
Their DSA empowers regulators to dictate what platforms promote or demote, under the guise of fighting “hate speech” and “misinformation.” In reality, it’s a tool to silence dissent against open borders, climate hysteria, or any narrative challenging the globalist agenda.
This fine doesn’t exist in a vacuum—it’s part of a chilling pattern of EU overreach that threatens privacy and free speech across the continent. Take the proposed Chat Control law, which would mandate backdoors into encrypted messages on apps like WhatsApp and Signal.
Sold as a child protection measure, it would scan billions of private conversations, exposing users to hacking, fraud, and government spying. Signal’s CEO Meredith Whittaker slammed it as a “catastrophic about-face” that betrays Europe’s privacy commitments, while experts warn of mass false positives and geopolitical abuse.
Then there’s Brussels’ aggressive enforcement tactics. In May of this year, the European Commission sued Czechia, Spain, Cyprus, Poland, and Portugal for dragging their feet on DSA implementation—specifically for not appointing national coordinators or setting penalties. Critics see this as forcing member states into a surveillance straitjacket, where platforms must over-censor to avoid fines, stifling smaller voices and user privacy.
At the heart of it all is the EU’s obsession with controlling information flows. In a January 2024 speech at Davos, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen declared disinformation the “top concern” for the coming years, calling for a “new global framework” where governments and Big Tech collaborate to police AI and online content.
She praised the DSA for defining platform responsibilities, but the subtext was clear: crush platforms like X that don’t toe the line. Jourová echoed this, meeting with Meta and YouTube execs to ensure compliance while targeting Musk’s “absolutism.”
These moves expose the hypocrisy: the EU claims to champion democracy but builds an Orwellian apparatus that monitors, scans, and punishes speech. It’s not about safety—it’s about power.
This latest EU assault on X has infuriated US Vice President JD Vance, who yesterday, as rumors of the impending penalty circulated, took to X and posted “The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage.”
Rumors swirling that the EU commission will fine X hundreds of millions of dollars for not engaging in censorship. The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) December 4, 2025
Vance’s previously blistering critiques of European tyranny sent shockwaves through Brussels. In a February 2025 speech at the Munich Security Conference, Vance tore into EU leaders for preaching democracy while arresting citizens for silent prayer, canceling elections, and ignoring voters on mass migration.
“No voter on this continent went to the ballot box to open the floodgates to millions of unvetted immigrants,” he declared, labeling Europeans as more than “interchangeable cogs in a global economy.”
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius called Vance’s opinions “unacceptable,” proving Vance’s point about normalized authoritarianism.
Vance’s words were prescient—today’s fine on X exemplifies how the EU weaponizes laws to crush free speech platforms, treating them as threats to their controlled narrative. With Trump back in the White House and Vance as a key ally, expect pushback: America won’t stand idly by as allies erode the very freedoms that define the West.
The $140 million hit on X isn’t just a fine—it’s a declaration of war on uncensored dialogue. Musk’s platform remains one of the last major outposts where ideas flow freely, unhampered by globalist filters. As the EU tightens its grip, the message is clear: comply or be crushed.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
More news on our radar

When a person logs on to Twitter X,
there should be an option to choose,
(1) Normal Twitter X that conforms to EU rules,
(2) Adult Satire Twitter X conforming to current Twitter X rules.
Obviously only adults over 18 should be able to log on to ver.(2).
Obviously when logging on to ver.(2) , a disclaimer must be accepted to proceed.
People will acknowledge that ver.(2) is satire, adults only, prone to misinformation, may contain foul and hurtful language, etc. before proceeding.
Every time they log on.
And… ver.(1) and ver.(2) cannot CROSS-POST !
This could be a solution.
But ver.(2) may not get so much ad revenue.
ver.(1) Twitter X P.C.
ver.(2) Twitter X Adult Satire
Somebody let Musk know.
Me?
Don’t have Twitter X account.
Pull out of Europe. Ban all European politicians from the platform, even if they use a VPN, but leave regular Europeans able to connect via VPN.