A clip of Barack Obama calling for a State crackdown on content shared to social media has gone viral.
In the footage, Obama explicitly advocates for government regulatory constraints on social media platforms to enforce a singular set of “facts” and suppress what he deems “hateful,” “polarizing,” or “dangerous” content.
Speaking at The Connecticut Forum in Hartford, alongside historian Heather Cox Richardson, Obama framed this as a necessary evolution in journalism and digital discourse. However, his remarks reveal a profound tension: a professed embrace of “diversity of opinion” paired with a push to criminalise divergence from elite-approved narratives under the Orwellian banner of combating “diversity of facts.”
Obama pines for a social media Ministry of Truth:
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) June 19, 2025
"We want diversity of opinion. We don't want diversity of facts…it will require some government regulatory constraints."
"There is a difference between these platforms letting all voices be heard, versus a business model that… pic.twitter.com/CVnTJHqZ13
While the clip dates from June, it has been spread widely over the past 24 hours on social media, with commentators noting that it is not mere rhetoric, but rather a direct call for censorship, dressed in the garb of democratic preservation.
Obama’s arrogance shines through in his unspoken premise: his facts are the immutable truth, while any challenge constitutes a societal threat warranting state intervention.
“Part of what we’re going to have to do is to start experimenting with new forms of journalism and how do we use social media in ways that reaffirm facts, separate facts from opinion. We want diversity of opinion. We don’t want diversity of facts,” he asserts.
He then immediately escalates, declaring “there is a difference between these platforms letting all voices be heard versus a business model that elevates the most hateful voices, or the most polarizing voices, or the most dangerous in the sense of inciting violence voices.”
“That I think is going to be a big challenge for all of us that we’re going to have to undertake,” he further states.
Obama’s proposed framework directly mirrors George Orwell’s 1984, where the Ministry of Truth oversees reality. When he calls to “reaffirm facts, separate facts from opinion,” he demands platforms prioritize “verified” information—but who does the verifying?
Obama assumes elite consensus, like his claims on the 2020 election, is fact while dissent becomes mere “opinion.” His declaration that “we want diversity of opinion” but “don’t want diversity of facts” represents arrogant gatekeeping, treating contested issues such as COVID origins or election integrity as settled and labeling skeptics “dangerous.”
Proposing “government regulatory constraints” means state mandates on algorithms and business models—a false assurance, as it compels viewpoint discrimination by forcing platforms to demote “hateful” speech.
Finally, his warning against platforms that “elevate the most hateful and dangerous” voices equates dissent with threat, using subjective smears where “polarising” targets anything right-of-center and debate gets conflated with violence.
Earlier in the interview, Obama’s “reptilian brain” riff blames social media for amplifying “anger, resentment, [and] conspiracy theories”—code for narratives challenging progressive orthodoxy.
The contradiction is glaring. He champions “diversity of opinion” yet brands diverging views “hateful.” This reveals the hubris: Obama’s narratives are truth; yours are poison.
The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” Obama’s proposal infringes directly. It engages in viewpoint discrimination by forcing platforms to “elevate” approved facts while demoting “hateful” ones, which is unconstitutional content-based censorship.
Obama’s “consistent with the First Amendment” caveat thus rings completely hollow.
The full Obama interview is below:
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
More news on our radar

The feckless clown and pile of dog-shit Barack Hussein Obumbler would not know the truth if it hit him in the face. He started the downfall of this nation, he should be tried for treason and suffer the consequences of such.
Till I first looked at the document which was of 8430 dollars, I accept that my friend’s brother was like really earning cash in his free time with his pc. T5 Her aunt’s neighbor has been doing this for 10 months and by now repaid the loan on their house and purchased a new Car .
Get started today… the site is mention in my name for more info
If either the left or the right were capable of the truth, they would tell you that the magnetic pole is infact the tracking of the camp of the saints moving towards siberia for the gog magog war. They would also tell you that the recent aurora borealas movement south were a sign of change. They would also tell you that yashua is not the hebrew name of Jesus because hebrew was extinct in the time of Jesus and the hebrew today originates from an invented block hebrew created in the 9th century by the jews which is kaballah mysticism. They would also tell you that every bible produced in the world was based of the masoratic old testament which was rewritten old testiment by the jews with kabalistic ritual language that has rewritten time lines to purposely exclude Jesus and prove the appostles liars. They would tell you that the correct old testament with correct timelines which Jesus followed was the Greek septuagent. They would also tell you that yawh is nowhere in the real old testament and that it is the pagan sun god in the kabalistic masoritic writings. Jesus never called The Father yawh, jahovah or anything else, he is simply Lord or The Father. They wuld tell you that the language spoken in holyland was actually greek which is why all gospels were written in greek and that aramaic which was a minority language also spoken by Jesus and also the pharasees was a minority language which the jews adapted later to form block hebrew. Yashua is the kabalistic god mimtet. They would also tell you the dead sea scrolls were a freemasonic hoax because they are written in block hebrew on goat skin when they language used at the time they were proported to have been dated were greek and aramaic. They would also tell you that Jesus did return and they have spent the last three hundred years trying to wipe out his existence on earth. They would also tell you that the sole purpose of ai is to raise an ai army since all tech is dependent on quartz to function being the sands of the sea. They wont tell you the truth, neither will you priests and pastors because they are all in the club to keep you controlled and away from the narrow path of Jesus Christ. Their time is coming to an end very soon and most of the left and the right will be thrown into the fire with satan forever.
I want to hear what EVERYONE has to say.
I’ll determine who I will block…NOT BAN!!!!
Only ban should be for child molesters/pedos/child porn…..all others need to be able to communicate so we know who is who and WE decide who WE listen to.